On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:29:01PM +0100, M. Mueller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:40:02PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote: > > Basically, it tells the addressee ``Don't reply to the address in the > > `From:' field, but to this one/these, please.'' > > > > See [1]RFC 822, section 4.4.3 for details. > > > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc822 > > > > Is this what you asked for? > > Indeed. Currently I am setting From and Return-path to the same values > in the default values and the folder-hook values > > Is Return-path necessary? It seems redundant. Your description doesn't > imply that it's necessary. I'll read the RFC. Thanks.
I wouldn't have thought that the MUA should set Return-Path at all; it's not its job. A brief glance at the mutt source shows no code that seems to set Return-Path. Just leave it out of your .muttrc altogether? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
