>>>>> "John" == John L Fjellstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is sysfs going to replace procfs or something?
John> Not a replacement, an extension. Procfs was originally intended
John> to be just for the processor-related info, I think,
Process related, not processor related.
John> and slowly it got added more features (like disk info, system info
John> etc). With sysfs, anything that doesn't belong to procfs will go
John> there.
So far it seems only the device information has moved over. Things like the
sysconf interface, net directory, sysvipc information, and files in the root
directory of the /proc fs, are still only found in /proc. Anyone has any
idea about whether they will eventually be moved as well?
Regards,
Isaac.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
