On 13 Apr 2004, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2004-04-12 15:25:39 -0700, Peter Sebastian Masny wrote:
> > Hrmph.  Old spamassassin incompatible with new perl in stable.
> > 
> > Using the proposed-update spamassassin (woody4) did not fix the problem 
> >  Probably have to use testing version, which means testing for a bunch 
> > of libraries... sigh.
> 
> Anyway the woody version of spamassassin marks too many legitimate
> messages as spam.
> 

So why not use spamprobe instead? I get no false positives at all and
only about 2  false negatives most days.

Anthony

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    ||  http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian ||  for book reviews, electronic 
Windows-free zone      ||  books and skeptical articles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to