>brian white writes ("Re: FTP Installation & Package Naming Conventions "):
>> Also, while the versions are not choosen by Debian, the format in which
>> they are written could be. It really makes little difference whether it
>> is called "bison-A2.5-0.deb" or "bison-2.5A-0.deb".
>
>The sorting implications are very different, and this is important
>because dpkg and dselect can be reluctant to downgrade packages.
Ah, so these version num...er...strings are lexigraphically ordered? I never
saw that documented anywhere.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
