(received this by mail and thought I'd pass it along to everybody)
>> How about another field in "Packages-Master" called "Filename: ..."?
>
>IMO No not an extra field. Conform ourselves to the name-version-revision
>scheme. Can't that be done. I don't get it.
Let me clarify... Nobody has to write an extra field! The program that
generates the "Packages-Master" file would prepend the filename to the
description _in_that_file_only!
I'd prefer to standardize the filename, but I don't think people are willing
to do that.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
