Hi, > In Unix, `ls' is a system component upon the definition of which > countless other system components -- procedures, programs, and scripts > of various kinds -- depend, and I think that is why the idea of > replacing the standard Unix `ls' with something else continues to meet > with negative enthusiasm.
Have you ever called "ls --help"? I dont think there is much left from the Old Version X "ls". > Better, I think, to let `ls' be `ls' and let your "colorized ls" > be something entirely separate. I don't see the reason for 2 Programs which one beeing the superset of another. Color-ls is inteligent enough to be completely backward compatible. And one can easyly unconfigure colors. (Its the same thing with the -F option, you dont want to tell me that you want to get removed that, also?) Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],ka.sub.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/ o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +4972573817 *plush* (O____O) If privacy is outlawed only Outlaws have privacy
