debian-vote  

Messages by Date

• 2004/01/11 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/11 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Michael Banck
• 2004/01/11 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Tore Anderson
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract MJ Ray
• 2004/01/11 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/01/11 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue MJ Ray
• 2004/01/11 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Martin Schulze
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Clint Adams
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Kyle McMartin
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Scott James Remnant
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/10 GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free John Lines
• 2004/01/10 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/10 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Rene Engelhard
• 2004/01/10 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/10 Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Steve Langasek
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Steve Langasek
• 2004/01/10 a different kind of proposal on the non-free issue Dale E Martin
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Oliver Elphick
• 2004/01/10 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Theodore Ts'o
• 2004/01/10 [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: Revoking non-free less violently Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/01/10 Re: Revoking non-free less violently Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/10 Re: Revoking non-free less violently Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Raul Miller
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/10 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
• 2004/01/10 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Kenshi Muto
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Shawn Yarbrough
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Raul Miller
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Raul Miller
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Joe Nahmias
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Jeroen van Wolffelaar
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Steve Langasek
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Chad Walstrom
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free John Goerzen
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/09 Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: Let's vote already... David N. Welton
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/09 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Santiago Vila
• 2004/01/08 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/08 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Raul Miller
• 2004/01/08 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Joe Nahmias
• 2004/01/08 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal MJ Ray
• 2004/01/08 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/08 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
• 2004/01/08 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/08 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal MJ Ray

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]