debian-vote  

Messages by Date

• 2004/01/15 Social Contract proposal -- 20040116-03 Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey Spiridonov
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
• 2004/01/15 Re: Social Contract Proposal -- 2003015-04 Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? John Lines
• 2004/01/15 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/14 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Henning Makholm
• 2004/01/14 Re: Technical: Voting software Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/14 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/14 Social Contract Proposal -- 2003015-04 Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: Social Contract Proposal -- 2030114-14 Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/14 Re: Technical: Voting software Chad Walstrom
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Sven Luther
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/14 Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
• 2004/01/14 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal John Goerzen
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Sergey V. Spiridonov
• 2004/01/14 Technical: Voting software Alon Altman
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: non-free and users? Sergey Spiridonov
• 2004/01/14 non-free and users? Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Social Contract Proposal -- 2030114-14 Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Comments on amending the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/14 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/13 Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/13 Re: Updated draft of social contract changes Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/13 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/13 Re: We *can* be Free-only Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/13 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: GR: Removal of non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Henning Makholm
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Branden Robinson
• 2004/01/13 Re: Updated draft of social contract changes Joe Nahmias
• 2004/01/13 OT: Fair Use not universal (Re: summary of software licenses in non-free) Don Armstrong
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/13 Re: Updated draft of social contract changes Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Henning Makholm
• 2004/01/13 Re: Updated draft of social contract changes Joe Nahmias
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Dale E Martin
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract MJ Ray
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Raul Miller
• 2004/01/13 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Dale E Martin
• 2004/01/13 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/13 Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free Andreas Metzler
• 2004/01/13 Re: Updated draft of social contract changes Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/13 Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/13 Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
• 2004/01/13 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue MJ Ray
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/01/13 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/01/12 Updated draft of social contract changes Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free John Lines
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/12 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Michael Banck
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Gunnar Wolf
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/12 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Gunnar Wolf
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/12 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Drew Scott Daniels
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/01/12 Re: We *can* be Free-only John Goerzen
• 2004/01/12 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 [Proposal] Revised Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
• 2004/01/12 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Sergey Spiridonov
• 2004/01/12 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Sven Luther
• 2004/01/12 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Martin Schulze
• 2004/01/11 Re: We *can* be Free-only Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/11 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free isa dumb idea Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: We *can* be Free-only Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/01/11 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Michael Banck
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Michael Banck
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Michael Banck
• 2004/01/11 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/11 Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
• 2004/01/11 Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/11 Re: Why not s/non-free/semi-free/g and remove non-free. Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/11 Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
• 2004/01/11 Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Why not s/non-free/semi-free/g and remove non-free. Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Tollef Fog Heen
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Tollef Fog Heen
• 2004/01/11 Why not s/non-free/semi-free/g and remove non-free. Osamu Aoki
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Social Contract Amendment Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/11 Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/01/11 [Comments] Re: [Proposal] Social Contract Amendment Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Subject: Proposal - keep non-free, but commit to actively encouraging making individual packages obsolet Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 [Proposal] Social Contract Amendment Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Santiago Vila
• 2004/01/11 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...) Sven Luther
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Raul Miller
• 2004/01/11 Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/01/11 Re: Another Non-Free Proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/01/11 Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract Anthony Towns

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]