On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Joey Hess wrote: > Joseph Carter wrote: > > Without regard to constitutionality, I believe there are technical reasons > > why non-free should remain a little while longer. Netscape is the biggest > > of them at the moment since currently Mozilla is not ready to replace it. > > However, I find konqueror (in kdebase) quite able already. It does > everything I've needed netscape to do, including ssl, cookie management, > java and javascript, and good page layout. What was the version number of that in Potato again? > It feels great to purge netscape. > > -- Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a damn. email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Chris Lawrence
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Branden Robinson
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Anthony Towns
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Adam Heath
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joey Hess
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure John Galt
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Jordi Mallach
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joey Hess
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Jordi Mallach
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Kai Henningsen
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Peter Eckersley
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Matthew Vernon
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Taketoshi Sano
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Robert D. Hilliard

