Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can't because it ain't there. The only thing the constitution says > about any of this is that the secretary may make a decision. Apparently, > that decision need not be otherwise constitutional. I don't believe this > was intended. I don't believe it's right. And I'll be damned if I'm > going to simply ignore this precedent. Oh, the secretary's decision can be overridden. You don't need to argue that it's unconstitutional, you just need to pass the relevant GR, or amendment, or whatever is appropriate, to cause the precedent to be overridden. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Anthony Towns
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Santiago Vila
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Brendan O'Dea
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Chris Lawrence
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Branden Robinson
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Anthony Towns
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Adam Heath
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joey Hess
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure John Galt
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Jordi Mallach
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joey Hess
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Jordi Mallach
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Kai Henningsen
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Peter Eckersley

