On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 08:24:25AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> How about an alternative approach? A simple reply pointing out
> a few points of the constituition which are directly relevant,
> asking for reconsideration would be best. Be friendly and
> point out where you think the secretary has gone wrong.
>
> No grandstanding, though, thanks. This is a volunteer
> organisation, after all.
<aol>
I agree.
</aol>
Thanks,
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Josip Rodin
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Joseph Carter
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Branden Robinson
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Robert Woodcock
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Hamish Moffatt
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul D. Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Buddha Buck
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Anthony Towns
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold

