Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I beg to differ. Becoming a secretary does not mean one gives > up ones right to an opinions (indeed, if it does, I'll strongly > exhort people never to step up and volunteer for such a > disenfranchising post). I doesn't inherently. It depends on the exact circumstances. But one of the secretary's hats is Interpreter Of The Constitution. That is a judicial role, and it is important for judges to preserve the appearance of neutrality. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Branden Robinson
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Robert Woodcock
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Hamish Moffatt
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul D. Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Buddha Buck
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Anthony Towns
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Buddha Buck
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava

