Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5

[Raul Miller]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 05:08:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >     As to the social contract/dfsg issue; I think that arguably
> >  they can be deemed to be separate documents, perchance living in the
> >  same file by happenstance; in most correspindence since we have
> >  refeerred to them individually.

On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:17:28PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> I agree here.  Let's take this opportunity to split them.  List them both
> as foundational documents if we intend to do so, but split them
> regardless.

I think the reason that they're stuck together is so that it's
unambigous in the social contract what is meant where it says
"Debian Free Software Guidelines".

At this point, I guess it's likely that people have gotten the point.

Thanks,

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]