Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5

[Joseph Carter]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:37:44PM -0800, C.M. Connelly wrote:
>     JC> I agree here.  Let's take this opportunity to split them.
>     JC> List them both as foundational documents if we intend to
>     JC> do so, but split them regardless.
> 
> Can we do that without a vote?  ;-)

NFI, if we all think it should happen, I don't see why process should
stand in the way of doing something harmless to the text file to match the
way the project actually treats them.

I've got a feeling it WOULD require another vote though, under IWJ's
marvelous contribution to Debian procedural gridlock.

-- 
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>               GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/)         20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/)   44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3

<Knghtbrd> Okay, you people have started talking about BSDM applications of
           network hardware...  I think I'll run off and do something useful
           and Debianish and stay OUT of this one...
<Knghtbrd> (for a change)


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]