> Shouldn't this include a "No" option as well as "Further Discussion"? "no" to what ? hehe.. i guess "no" 's kinda attitude, eh? ;) never mind, oh, yes, :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation o... John Goerzen
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation o... John Goerzen
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation o... Branden Robinson
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation o... John Goerzen
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation o... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation o... John Goerzen
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguat... Manoj Srivastava
- PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation o... Buddha Buck
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation o... Sven LUTHER
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation o... zhaoway
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation o... Anthony Towns