Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One of the things we would like to know is what *you* think the > > consquences of various votes would be on a particular question. > > That's nice. How about you try thinking for yourself, instead?
I have. But one of the things that I would like to know are what your thoughts are. > Not when the consequence of presenting my opinion has been for everyone > from prospective maintainers to the project secretary to cast aspersions > on my character and commitment to the project. As Harry S Truman said, if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. > If you're not happy with what you've gotten us into, work out a solution > yourself. You've got _plenty_ of avenues. It seems to me that you are being deliberately obstructive. It makes me suspect that you cooked up a bogus "interpretation" deliberately to stick it to the 3:1 majority that voted for a resolution you don't like. And now you're waiting to do it again. But there is another explanation: that you just don't want to cooperate, and that's that, with no particular motive about resolutions, just a desire to be a dork about it. Or, geez, you could tell us: what would your actions be, for various of the resolutions, about the releasing of woody? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
