Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is "surprising" or "unintuitive" about Anthony's interpretations?
It seemed obvious to me, before the vote, that changes in the Social Contract would be handled the same way as changes in our other policy documents; that we would not instantly expect to conform to a new policy, but would instead continually try to get close to our goals, treating violations of policy as bugs. Anthony's is another plausible interpretation, but it was surprising to me because it seemed so clear to me that of course we'd phase the changes in the same sort of way we phase every other change in. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
