On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 12:40:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > There's no need to have a vote here at all: if you can convince the > technical ctte that the social contract doesn't mean what I think it says, > or can come up with a consensus that we don't care about being able to > have a literal interpretation of the social contract, then that's fine: > they can set the release policy back to what it was with no argument > from me. > > And on this issue, it's been answered by the project once. If the > project's going to change its mind, how is the project going to make > sure its new stance is any more sensible than the old one? Relying on > the expedient solution to be the best one seems... flawed to me.
Thanks Anthony, You answered all the interrogations I had about your relations with this GR. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
