Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > A part of the project is trying to send you the message that they want > > you to release sarge on the original timescale, irrespective of > > whether it gets completely purged of the non-free things that your > > interpretation of the previous SC did not consider DFSG-critical.
> So why don't any of the proposed GRs say this? That is what they all say - at least the way I read them. We're trying to find out if Anthony reads them the same way. He won't tell us either yes or no to that simple question. > > Those people are considering various ways of formally phrasing that > > message. They have asked you whether some of the ways being considered > > will actually fail to send the message. You have refused to answer > > that. > Why should this matter? How can it *not* matter? If the purpose of the GR is to send a message, the single most important fact when deciding which one to vote for is if one of the proposals will fail to do that. -- Henning Makholm "... and that Greek, Thucydides" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
