* Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040527 17:40]: > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:11:22AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040527 06:25]: > > > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:26:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > > Proposal F got the requisite number of seconds, and is now on > > > > the ballot. The discussion period has been reset. If someone would > > > > like to provide a 40 char description of the proposal for the ballot, > > > > I'll modify my draft ballot. > > > > > Maybe: > > > > > > [###] Choice F: Re-affirm current social contract > > > > No. The social contract says "our priorities are our users and the > > free software community". That's something quite different.
> Indeed it does. However, under the social contract as it is now we will > not be releasing Debian sarge with known non-free components, and that > is the intent of this amendment. Therefore, it re-affirms the current > social contract. You know that there are other interpretations of the social contract. Why do you think it appropriate to give one interpretation the official blessing before doing a GR on this? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
