-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> Well, most of those supporters probably did not believe the proposal > would or should have any effect on sarge's release. > > At least that was the case for me... And to not make the same mistake twice, is there some statement from the release manager somewhere regarding this vote? I would like to know exactly what effect the different choices would have on the release of sarge, accoring to the release manager. I have searched some lists a little but did not really find an answer to my question. Some of the questions that come to mind are: Can sarge realisticly be released before september 1st? (related to proposal A) Does the temporal change of the SC and rollback after the release of sarge cause problems for point releases of sarge? (related to several proposals) Does the list of "exempt" items from proposal C (documentation and firmware) cover enough items to be in line with the earlier release plan [1]? Is the next release really numbered 3.1? (relating to proposals C and E) [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg00000.html - -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA1vx+VYan35+NCKcRAtqCAKCBttN93dDfMmbYimfx6GvB3FItwQCgorsI cuD2Q7nNong5G4tBO8l16lM= =lqsX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
