> By making it very easy for a user who doesn't have rights to a package > to use such software without informed consent about those rights, we're > technically guilty of contributory infringement. > > No one has complained to us about this yet, but that doesn't make it > right.
There was actually an Ask Slashdot question posted a few days ago on this very subject. Most of the responses (when I looked) were along the lines of "There's *this* free software that does the same thing." Few actually addressed the licensing issue. There is probably some relevant discussion there, though. Greg ----------- The geek shall inherit the earth.
