Le Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 05:44:59PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait: > Note the return address on this mail is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > please deluge that address with suggested questions :> Oh, try to keep it > off /. - skript kiddies are not invited!
I hope I'm not too late because I have some questions. It's about QA. I think that we need better rules for QA. What do they plan to do for QA ? What do they think about things like that : - We should enforce that every developer MUST be suscribed to debian-devel-announce (and debian-devel-announce must be moderated). - We should enforce developer to always respond within 15 days or to mark themselves as "absent" (using the nice & securized & web accessible database). - What about rules for managing critical bugs ? A maintainer should always correct a RC bug within a month. If not then NMU are allowed. If he really has good reasons for refusing NMU even after this delay, he should explain the reasons in a mail sent to the BTS (so that people looking at bug reports know about it) - Will they give the power to a team to orphan packages maintained by MIA developers (hopefully with Echelon results) ? - Will they push forward the new proposed release system (with stable, unstable and testing) ? If you can't push them all in the debate, i'd like that they respond to the questions later here on debian-vote. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -=- http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/ <pub> CDs Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>
