[ I'm replying to myself but i'm starting a new thread ] Le Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog écrivait: > I hope I'm not too late because I have some questions. It's about QA.
So the debate has happened, some questions weren't asked. Thus I'd like that each candidate try to answer them. Thanks, Here they are : > I think that we need better rules for QA. What do they plan to do for QA ? > > What do they think about things like that : > - We should enforce that every developer MUST be suscribed to > debian-devel-announce (and debian-devel-announce must be moderated). > - We should enforce developer to always respond within 15 days or to mark > themselves as "absent" (using the nice & securized & web accessible > database). > - What about rules for managing critical bugs ? A maintainer should > always correct a RC bug within 15 days (or a month ?). If not then NMU > are allowed. If he really has good reasons for refusing NMU even after > this delay, he should explain the reasons in a mail sent to the BTS > (so that people looking at bug reports know about it) > - Will they give the power to a team to orphan packages maintained by > MIA developers (hopefully with Echelon results) ? > - Will they push forward the new proposed release system (with stable, > unstable and testing) ? > > If you can't push them all in the debate, i'd like that they respond to > the questions later here on debian-vote. -- Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/ <pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>
