On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:56:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:53:51AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > > >> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Here's how people voted: > > > Can any of you guys that recounted the results (you know you did) > > > confirm that the numbers are right? > > > > Hmm, actually, I get different results too. > > > > Just taking: > > The thing is, you only get a vote over someone else if they marked it. > > IOW, if I only mark "--1--", then my vote is as good as nothing, since I > made no preference of one over the other. So not specifying a rank in > the order pretty much alleviates that choice in the tally for that > particular vote.
Err, i thought that not voting for someone (leaving it blank) would mean that everyone would dominate that choice. I think the constitution or a previous message here explains it as such. Am i wrong ? Friendly, Sven Luther
