On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:31:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:41:46PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > What do you think of the idea of repeatedly re-using the votes with > > supermajority and default swapped, after adopting an option with > > supermajority, until the result stops changing?
I don't understand all this thing about changing defaults and so. Is it not enough to say that in a 2:1 supermajority case for option A, each vote for option A is halved, and then we run the election normally ? Friendly, Sven Luther
