On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 06:26:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:24:34AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:31:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:41:46PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > > > What do you think of the idea of repeatedly re-using the votes with > > > > supermajority and default swapped, after adopting an option with > > > > supermajority, until the result stops changing? > > I don't understand all this thing about changing defaults and so. > > Is it not enough to say that in a 2:1 supermajority case for option A, > > each vote for option A is halved, and then we run the election normally > > ? > > No, it's not.
Why ? Friendly, Sven Luther
