On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > I'm sorry, I didn't follow the special casing you do for "superdefeats". > False: once again you're eliminating a defeat of an option involved > in a superdefeat, but the proposal requires that the superdefeated > option be eliminated instead. Thus: > F superdefeats A 60:40 > A defeats B 50:10 > B defeats F 50:10 > C defeats F 50:10 > A defeats C 40:20 > B defeats C 40:20 > eliminate A
Ah. Same thing still applies though, all you need is some way to make the B
versus C defeat eliminated before you do whatever special casing you have.
40 A B C F
10 A C B F
10 F C B A
F superdefeats A 60:40 (scaled 3:1)
B defeats F 50:10
C defeats F 50:10
A defeats B 50:10
A defeats C 50:10
B defeats C 40:20
eliminate weakest defeat, BdC; eliminate A; you're left with B defeats F,
C defeats F, A eliminated, so B and C draw.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
pgpdOgGAVHXbm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
