On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:34:32PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:51:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Ah. Same thing still applies though, all you need is some way to make the B > > versus C defeat eliminated before you do whatever special casing you have. > > 40 A B C F > > 10 A C B F > > 10 F C B A > > F superdefeats A 60:40 (scaled 3:1) > False: A defeats F 50:30
You're welcome to do the numbers yourself to come up with the result I'm
trying to discuss, you know. This time for sure:
40 A B C F
10 C B F A
10 F A C B
F superdefeats A 60:40 (scaled 3:1)
B defeats F 50:10
C defeats F 50:10
A defeats B 50:10
A defeats C 50:10
B defeats C 40:20
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Australian Linux Lovefest Heads West''
-- linux.conf.au, Perth W.A., 22nd-25th January 2003
pgpqz61dNwsJW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
