On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:45:30PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > And, as I've already posted elsewhere, you'll note there's no problem > at all here if number of votes received is twice the quorum, which, > historically, it almost always is. >
I haven't had time to follow all the long discussion, so maybe I'm saying something which isn't correct, but: If we are sure that if 2*quorum people cast a vote there is no problem with the proposed system, why not add to the current proposal the fact that the votes cast, altogether, have to be at least 2*quorum? This will also ensure that, before taking a vote into consideration, there is enough general intrest about the issue... Bye, Guido