On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > That's part of what this proposal is all about. > > > > > > When we've dropped non-free, it's just Debian, no need to differentiate > > > between 'Debian', 'the Debian project', 'the Debian distribution' or > > > 'the non-free component of the Debian distribution'.
I responded: > > Except, none of the introduced proposals get rid of this issue. > > > > One of them hides the current most glaring instance of it, but that's > > not the same thing. > > > > Or maybe you don't consider the debian servers [and their contents] > > to be part of debian? On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:51:06PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > What are you talking about? Various concepts of what is part of Debian. -- Raul
