Op za, 19-11-2005 te 21:22 +0100, schreef Eduard Bloch: > And I cannot see much value that outside world would get from having > read access to -private but a much more serious problem with > practically uncontrolled disclosure of information that was guaranteed to > be not for public use until the end of days.
I wouldn't see much value in such a proposal, either. However, I strongly disagree with the stance that the proposal which is currently on the table would have anything to do with "practically uncontrolled disclosure". If anything, the opposite might be true... -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
