Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I second the amendment proposed by Anton Zinoviev in > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> I think that the whole body of Debian developers have their right to > express how they interpret the GFDL and that we need to vote on the > subject. This amendment being a regularly voiced opinion, it should > definitely be on the ballot. In that case, could someone please propose an amendment which captures the *other* regularly voiced opinion, namely that GFDL without invarient sections is DFSG-free but with invarient sections is not, and phrase that in an appropriate form as an override of the decision of a delegate so that we can be done with this and have all the options represented? Lots of technical problems have shown up with the current amendment that tried to do that and it clearly needs a revision in light of the discussion. If we're going to put all the options on the ballot, let's go ahead and put them *all* on the ballot so that no significant group of DDs can later claim that their opinion wasn't represented by the choices. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
