On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:40:32PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On 2/1/06, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This interpretation is not ad-hoc thing and I strongly belive that it > > represents not only my view but also the view of FSF. I asked Richard > > Stallman for confirmation and I will report here when I receive his > > reply. > > RMS has NO POWER to decide in Debian. We are talking about the DFSG.
So do I. But I had to disprove that my interpretation is ad-hoc. > What is it that you are going to ask from him? To confirm what we > already know? That the FSF regards the GFDL as a free licence, no > matter what? I asked if the second interpretation of DFSG expresses properly what modifications must be allowed about a particular software program or documentation for it to be considered free by FSF. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
