On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:45:42 +0200, Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> No, I think that Anton Zinoviev's amendment to the GR does *not*
> require a change to the DFSG.
> But as it is clear that DDs interpret the DFSG differently, I agree
> that a "clarification" to the DFSG #3 may be proposed at a later
> stage. This will require 3:1 majority, of course.
This is a procedural nightmare. What happens if we do split
things and Anton's proposal asses, we issue a statement, and the DFSG
amendment fails? We'll have a contradiction between a position
statement and the DFSG, which is bad.
I think these are related issues, and belong in one option on
the same ballot.
manoj
--
The whole of life is futile unless you consider it as a sporting
proposition.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
