On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:46:19 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Which means that you are perhaps arguing that we should make the change to > the DFSG which the amendment in question calls for.
I agree with this (e.g. that the Invariant sections are DFSG-compliant): http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/01/msg00240.html Since you and the Secretary (probably others as well) are interpeting the DFSG in a different way, perhaps it is a good idea to clarify that particular sentence, but it is not an obstacle for the current GR. -- Yavor Doganov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
