Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:18:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:17:05 +0100, Ian Jackson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > Perhaps it would be better if the policy maintainer were someone who >> > was more willing to listen and take on board comments ? >> This sounds like a canard. What official Board comments have >> been disregarded by the current set of policy maintainers? Or do you >> mean "Ian wants a Yes Man"? > > Ian meant "take comments under consideration", not "listen to comments > from the technical committee".
Manoj sometimes gives the impression of not listening, because he doesn't "nod" and say "yes, hm" by e-mail. But if you assert that he is in fact not listening and not taking into consideration what he hears, you should back up this claim with some references. I have the opposite impression: The bugs that get no answer in the BTS are fixed soon, only those that he discusses might be tricky, or he reluctant to fix them. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
