Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:34:01AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:40:52 +1000, Anthony Towns <[email protected]> >> said: >> > What has happened since is that the delegation has apparently been >> > taken as a mandate for the policy editors to set policy according to >> > their own opinion without any obligation to consult each other, or >> > the developers as a whole. I'm not willing to have delegations exist >> > in that way. >> Can you cite any instance that his has actually happened? > > Yes, you claimed that you didn't need any review because you were a > delegate on IRC.
I think that basing a decision with the DPL hat on just on what someone says on IRC is a bad idea. And of course you've been told multiple times that this didn't mean "no public review", but instead "no review through the normal review process". > I'm not willing to let a delegation stand while if it's being used as > a justification to not talk to other people; even if that's happening > only hypothetically. You were acting in anger. You did not wait and talk with your delegate again the other day. I think a leader should not act in anger, but should take the time for talking. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
