On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:58:06PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 2007-02-08, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >> Content-Disposition: inline
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >>
> >> Dear Debian voters,
> >>
> >> I hereby propose the following General Resolution for sponsoring.
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> The Debian project resolves that Debian developers allowed to perform
> >> combined source and binary packages uploads should be allowed to perform
> >> binary-only packages uploads for the same set of architectures.
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Why do you want to lose the ability to do src+bin uploads for arm+alpha?
> >
> > Or shouldn't there be a "all release candidate archs" somewhere in
> > there?
>
> Huh? I read it as the exact opposite.
>
> [...] In short: src+bin uploads are currently allowed.
^^^^^^^^^All stands in that _currently_. Bill's GR proposal says: if a dd $X has src+bin upload rights on $arch, then he should have bin-only upload rights on $arch. You can make that statement true by refuting the premise: This is true if $X can do binary-only uploads, but ALSO if he cannot do src+bin uploads on $arch. Meaning that in order to "apply" such a GR, if the ftp-master forbids src+bin-uploads for alpha and arm[0] for people that do not have binary-only upload rights, they would comply with the GR. Oh and yes, given some custom dak rules that forbids debian-policy uploads, I believe some ftp-master at least have shown they can chose to actually implement restrictions the twisted way. Cheers, [0] since it's what this GR targets if I'm not mistaken -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp5BhnJyTQkk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
