Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The DFSG are hereby amended to add the following additional guideline: > 10. No Required Contribution of Changes [...] > 11. No Required Identity Disclosure [...]
I think this is a bad idea because: - it is introducing redundancy into the guidelines - these are already covered by DFSGs 1 and 5; - it makes the guidelines longer, so will make checking packages against the guidelines more tedious; - it seems to be pandering to literalists in a similar way to the Editorial Changes GR and that hasn't really ended those arguments; - I think that the second addition disallows things like pseudonyms, which I think we have accepted in the past. However, I would probably support these additions over FD. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
