Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I think there is still high controversy over these criteria, which
> appeal mostly the DFSG-revisionsts which a few years ago colonized
> debian-legal. [...]

Marco d'Itri claimed existance of such DFSG-revisionists in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/12/msg00160.html
(apologies for the "fraudster" shout in my first reply) but went all
quiet when I showed that it looks like non-money fees were DFSG
breaches before debian-legal even existed...

Regards,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to