Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Marco d'Itri claimed existance of such DFSG-revisionists in > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/12/msg00160.html > >(apologies for the "fraudster" shout in my first reply) but went all > >quiet when I showed that it looks like non-money fees were DFSG > >breaches before debian-legal even existed... > > Yes, I went all quiet because (as I already explained to you at least > once) I was relocating and staring a new job (which is much more > interesting than posting to Debian lists, so I rarely read them nowadays).
Maybe relocating, but not on VAC AFAICS and still active on various lists, including debian-legal, for at least a week after the above and still haven't produced *any* references to suggest that such DFSG-1-revisionists exist, despite another request in March. > Can't you come up with anything better than this? Why do I need to? Can you show that those DFSG-1-revisionists exist? If not, stop trolling. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
