Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: >> Il giorno gio, 21/06/2007 alle 17.37 +0200, Bastian Venthur ha scritto: >>> So, why such a complicated GR introducing second class DDs? Just grant a >>> few more rights to our NMs and try to improve the NM process in the long >>> run and everybody will be happy. >> Esquisitely true.
> In short, this DM status is complementary to NM. It's not working around > any deficiency in the NM process. I really doubt that. If I read Anthony's links he have in his GR proposal, it all sounds very much like a workaround for the problems with our NM process. Especially the second one "Reforming the NM process". And the main question is is still open: Why do we need this DM status? Which problem does it solve, if not the ones with our NM process? I think Anthony should have give those reasons directly in his proposal, so that people like me who don't know what he's trying to solve don't have to guess. Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de Debian Developer venthur at debian org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
