On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:00:14PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > I agree as well, but it's all that we require DDs to subscribe to. > > [That said, we really should work to make d-d-a enough; decisions that > > and transitions that affect multiple packages should be announced > > there.] > > > Frankly, there's nothing stoping us from recommending/requiring DMs to > > be active/subscribed to other lists too; we just have to do it. > > If you announce too many transitions there that aren't relevant to > the vast majority of maintainers, those maintainers will stop paying > attention to d-d-a. IMHO most transitions should be coordinated > privately among the affected developers, as is generally the case > today.
Right; I guess I really meant that information on transitions that wasn't directly communicated to affected maintainers. Don Armstrong -- Information wants to be free to kill again. -- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
