Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think the committee would be worse off without you; and I find > it fundamentally disturbing that any of the founding members are still > members ten years later.
I think this sentence strikes at the core of my reservations about this proposal. The whole thing feels like an appeal to novelty fallacy. I see nothing inherently wrong with someone having been on the technical committee for its entire history; in fact, on the surface, it looks like a feature to me. I've not seen a reason to believe that rotating the technical committee would, in and of itself, make it better, or that new members would somehow bring more to it than the existing members simply because they're new. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
