On Mon, Nov 17 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: > >> > This will need wording to change the SC >> >> Since the proponents have not yet formulated a new version for the >> changes to the foundation documents, here it is. > > This is not part of my GR as proposed and seconded. > > If anybody wants to change the words of either the DFSG or the SC they > will need to propose an amendmend. > > As proposed this clarifies my and other people's view of what our > foundation documents mean. You are welcome to add a > note/comment/explanation to the SC, but this doesn't modify it.
You are making a permanent change to the statement made in the DFSG (all programs need source code); this is being passed with a 3:1 majority, so of course the foundation documnents will have to be changed. The only way to supersede the foundation document, as defined in the constitution, is to change it via a 3:1 vote. This is the only way to reconcile the GR with the constitution, in my opinion. manoj -- "If all men were brothers, would you let one marry your sister?" Author Unknown Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]