* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081117 18:02]: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:50:50PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > And who is going to modify it if the original vote does not include a > > wording? > > If a vote supersedes a part of a foundation document but does not specify > editing instructions, I believe the only correct thing to do is to add the > actual decision as an addendum to the original document (like the US does with > its constitutional amendments). > > A later vote could then decide to strike that addendum and incorporate it in > the document as a change in wording, but that's just cosmetics.
Even though I think this is ugly, I agree that this is the correct way to handle it. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
