On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The constitution should really be clear so that interpretation is almost > never needed.
Agreed. > We should fix the constitution so that we can leave the duty of > interpreting the constitution to the secretary. Agreed. > We just need to make it > clear that the secretary doesn't have to interpret the foundation > documents to handle his secretarial work and that he must apply 3:1 ratio > based on what the GR says (explicit supersession or not) and not on what > he believes it means in practice. I think that that is probably the opposite of what we need. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
