On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:12:24AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > [email protected] (Robert Millan) writes: > > > So, what I think would be the honest approach to this problem, is for you to > > either announce that your interpretation is the way it is because the ballot > > was flawed ... > > In my preamble to the second call for votes, > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/12/msg00411.html > > I said: > > It is clear that there are flaws with the way the current ballot > is constructed.
I know that, but the difference between "A and B" and "A because B" is very significant here. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
