On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:13:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Please, could you send a new message clarifiing the situation, and your > judgement as Secretary?
While this GR was still in the discussion period, Manoj posted an analysis of what each option meant; and he also judged that option 5 meant release. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/11/msg00186.html <[email protected]> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:45:56 -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > ,----[ Proposal 5: allow Lenny to release with firmware blobs ] > ... > i Do we require source for firmware in main: Yes* > ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs: No > iii What do we do for Lenny: Release > iV Do we modify foundation documents: No > v Do we override foundation documents No > > * This proposal gives the binary blobs distributed in the kernel > the benefit of doubt, and assumes they do not violate the GPL and are > the preferred form of modification, however unlikely that is. -- Steve Cotton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
